John Miedema

I have read about 2500 books. Print books. I have only read 2.5 ebooks on my new Kindle. In this fourth post in my Kindle shakedown series, I consider the Kindle book reading experience. Given my history with print it is not surprising that I maintain a preference for it, but I enjoy reading on the Kindle more than I expected.

A primary reason for getting an ereader was my interest in reading the work of indie writers publishing via ebooks. Like many others, writer Cliff Burns was frustrated with the traditional publishing establishment and distributed his novel, So Dark the Night, full-length on the web. I was unwilling to read a 449 page PDF on my laptop. Reluctantly, I printed it, two pages to a side, two-sided. It was the first time I thought about getting an ereader. When I finally got a Kindle last Christmas, the first book I looked at was Burn’s PDF. It looked better when I used the Kindle’s screen rotation to view it horizontally.

I had planned to buy the print version of Doctorow’s Makers, but once I had the Kindle I took advantage of the ebook download he distributes for free for publicity. I did not finish this selection but I do not attribute it to the ereader. The premise of the story was good, the writing was fine, but I am inclined to leave books that do not hook me by the hundredth page. The same thing could have happened with a print book. I have since read two more ebooks with greater satisfaction. For the most part, I felt like I was reading a book, only a bit slower. I suspect my base reading skills are being rewired just slightly, like the experience of seeing through a new pair of glasses. Sometimes I scan pages when I read, but on the Kindle I was forced to click ahead one page at a time, and could not easily jump back and forth over multiple pages. I would hate to cram a textbook this way. I prefer page numbers but can live with the Kindle’s “locations”. I considered that book covers are less prominent on an ebook, a loss rather like cover art on LPs.

In my book, Slow Reading, I asserted that ebooks are only metadata for print books. Computers are superior for finding information and acceptable for reading snippets, but the print book is still the superior technology for reading anything of length or substance. After reading on the Kindle, I also read a print book and again found it a richer reading experience, but only marginally. In the future, I will make a point of distinguishing ebooks from ereaders. The Kindle and its competitors are not interesting because they mix digital technology with book content, i.e., ebooks; the computer did that. Ereaders are compelling because they merge digital technology with an acceptable physical interface for long-form reading. The Kindle is not the final form of the ereader but it is a worthy step in that direction.