Birth of the Reader-Writer
- I, Reader: A Nod to Asimov’s I, Robot
- Robots and Readers: A Tight Coupling of Container and Content
- Does Technology only Extend Thought? Does It also Supplant It?
- Machine Life: The Final Prejudice
- RB-34 Prefers Slushy Novels
- Creative Reading: A Golden String
- Creative Reading by anemone achtnich
- Creative Reading: The Art of Self
- Creative Reading: Thinking with Other Minds
- Creative Reading: The Art of Self, Take 2
- Creative Reading: The Discovery of Other (Thinking with the Minds of Others, Take 2)
- Creative Reading: The Mathematics of Self, Other and Extension
- What Books Changed You?
- I’ve always admired people who, in a pinch, are better than their principles
- Every Extension Breaks a Rule
- The Trajectory of Reading: Creative Contribution
- I Read, Therefore I Write
- What Readers Write May Not Be Literature, But It Might Become So
- “Narrow it down to … the upper left-hand brick”: Phaedrus
- “No one that he knew had ever written a whole metaphysics before”: Phaedrus
- Using a Blog to Draft a Book Idea: 9 Observations
- From Reading to Writing to Publishing with Digital Media
- Birth of the Reader-Writer
- To Read a Book is to Ignore 4000 Others
- Quantity has a Quality all its Own
- The Web is Re-Wiring My Brain
- How the Web Works for Readers: Thin Connections Lead to Rich Connections
- The Accidental Programmer
- Definitions of Hacking
- Ways of the Reader-Hacker
- Ways of the Reader-Hacker II: Breaking the Rules
- Ways of the Reader Hacker III: Two Bright Ideas
- A Hacker’s Reading List
- Ones and Zeros, On and Off Switches, All Sane Systems Require Downtime
- The Information Race and Pushing the Button
- How to Make an Elephant Statue
- Every Story Deserves a Good Ending
- Expressions of Offworld
- “Would I start to resemble a book myself?”
- Myth of the Reader-Hero
- Print is Digital
- Am I Still Chasing that First Reading High?
- Do Robots Read? Yes I Do (Conclusion to “I, Reader”)
- I, Reader: A Book Outline
- Reading List for Next Draft of I, Reader
Reading Causes Writing, Pt. 5. Conclusion to this theme.
Literary theorists talk about the “death of the author”, a view that a work should be considered independent of the personal details of the author. In its place, we have the “birth of the reader”, the new source of meaning when interpreting a text. But things have changed again. Readers have been extended on-line. They publish their thoughts online as they are reading a book. Other readers are influenced by what is being written about a book as they are reading it, and then writing about it themselves. In turn, the writers are reading it back. Furthermore, readers converse with authors of books they are reading, even as the author is writing the next book the reader will later review. We have a new birth, the birth of the reader-writer.
The birth of the reader-writer seems like a happy thing. Everyone gets to play. Readers get to be writers. They can check their stats daily, hourly, by the minute, to see how popular their writing is. There’s no denying the narcissism in it. Looking at your stats is like looking in a mirror. It’s only a problem if it happens too often. It often does. But that is to be expected. Narcissism is the first effect of extension by technology, so McLuhan tells us. It’s the hype phase of a new technology. It is the period in which we sense our identity has been extended in some powerful way.
What is this reader-writer? What are the implications? Another name for Web 2.0 is the read-write web. Early on, it was difficult for non-technical sorts to publish to the web. Now it is easy. It has been observed that people do not keep diaries anymore. We yield up our interior life to the web. What am I reading now? What page am I on? I can’t believe the main character just did that! It is as if there is an inner camera uploading to the web, offering a map of our mind.
Ray Kurzweil is a futurist, who believes it is possible to fashion an artificial intelligence, ultimately superior to human intelligence. In his book, The Age of Spiritual Machines (referenced previously), Kurzweil provides a blueprint for building one. A starting point is reverse engineering the human mind. Sound tough? Well, our reader-writer is doing just that, uploading a map of the mind to the web. Perhaps it’s for the robots after all. [diabolical laughter]
Wikipedia (2009). The death of the author. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_the_author.
Wikipedia (2009). Post-structuralism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-structuralism.

This takes me back to your comments about the reader as introvert. If the reader is reading as part of a group (the ubiquitous book club), exchanging tweets or reading the live journal of her favorite author, introversion is being turned into extroversion. If there are gangs of authors all reading each other and sharing their work (from across the country and around the world) is everything a collaboration?
This is changing the relationship between the reader and the book. I just don’t know if it is a bad thing or a good thing.
“In the future, reading and writing will be a social activity, the hierarchy between authors and readers will disappear, readers will help write a book while they’re reading it. Skeptical? You’re not the first. Bob Stein of The Institute for the Future of the Book is used to skepticism, but he’s seen the future and he’s here to talk about it.”
http://lisnews.org/books_20
Leave your response!
Slow Reading
Available from Litwin Books | Read a chapter online
OpenBook WordPress Plugin
Inserts a book cover image, title, author, and other book data from Open Library into a WordPress post.
Download the Plugin | Read More | Report an Issue | Join the Discussion List
Series
Other posts belonging to this series
What I’m Reading
Also Reading