Every Extension Breaks a Rule
- I, Reader: A Nod to Asimov’s I, Robot
- Robots and Readers: A Tight Coupling of Container and Content
- Does Technology only Extend Thought? Does It also Supplant It?
- Machine Life: The Final Prejudice
- RB-34 Prefers Slushy Novels
- Creative Reading: A Golden String
- Creative Reading by anemone achtnich
- Creative Reading: The Art of Self
- Creative Reading: Thinking with Other Minds
- Creative Reading: The Art of Self, Take 2
- Creative Reading: The Discovery of Other (Thinking with the Minds of Others, Take 2)
- Creative Reading: The Mathematics of Self, Other and Extension
- What Books Changed You?
- I’ve always admired people who, in a pinch, are better than their principles
- Every Extension Breaks a Rule
- The Trajectory of Reading: Creative Contribution
- I Read, Therefore I Write
- What Readers Write May Not Be Literature, But It Might Become So
- “Narrow it down to … the upper left-hand brick”: Phaedrus
- “No one that he knew had ever written a whole metaphysics before”: Phaedrus
- Using a Blog to Draft a Book Idea: 9 Observations
- From Reading to Writing to Publishing with Digital Media
- Birth of the Reader-Writer
- To Read a Book is to Ignore 4000 Others
- Quantity has a Quality all its Own
- The Web is Re-Wiring My Brain
- How the Web Works for Readers: Thin Connections Lead to Rich Connections
- The Accidental Programmer
- Definitions of Hacking
- Ways of the Reader-Hacker
- Ways of the Reader-Hacker II: Breaking the Rules
- Ways of the Reader Hacker III: Two Bright Ideas
- A Hacker’s Reading List
- Ones and Zeros, On and Off Switches, All Sane Systems Require Downtime
- The Information Race and Pushing the Button
- How to Make an Elephant Statue
- Every Story Deserves a Good Ending
- Expressions of Offworld
- “Would I start to resemble a book myself?”
- Myth of the Reader-Hero
- Print is Digital
- Am I Still Chasing that First Reading High?
- Do Robots Read? Yes I Do (Conclusion to “I, Reader”)
- I, Reader: A Book Outline
- Reading List for Next Draft of I, Reader
50 Books that Changed Me, Pt. 3, Undergrad
Every extension of mind breaks a rule. Undergrad years are a good time for innovative thinking and rule breaking.
Psychology 020 text. I took a year off before going to university, but I knew I wanted to study psychology so I read an introductory text, learning the scope of the field and how to think about psychological phenomena in a scientific manner. I tried to apply my high school physics to craft an ‘atomic’ psychology. I later learned that a turn of the century psychologist, Titchener, had tried something like this using introspection as an observation tool. For my honour’s year thesis, I asked people to report their experience when introspecting and correlated it with their beliefs about reality. People who hold conservative beliefs don’t ’see’ much; those with transcendent beliefs see much more. Interesting, eh?
The Tao of Physics. Fritjof Capra explored the parallels between eastern mysticism and western physics. Critics, including my philosophy of science professor, said that Capra wrongly connected ‘real’ concepts in physics with metaphorical ones, e.g., energy. Well, I disagree. I see the energy described in physics as the same kind of physical energy at work in my mind and body. At the most basic level of reality, it all comes down to energy.
Zen and the Art of Motorcyle Maintenance. I read Robert Pirsig’s autobiographical book in my twenties, and again in my thirties. The author’s pursuit of Quality drives outside him outside academia, the ‘Church of Reason’, and breaks him. Several years later, patched up, the ghosts of the past threaten him again.
The Personal Nature of Notions of Consciousness. Imants Baruss is a psychology professor at King’s College, a small campus of the University of Western Ontario. Baruss’ course on consciousness shaped my interest in psychology, leading to two independent studies and my honour’s thesis. It is hard to shortlist a number of other worthy books I found as a result. Barr’s A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness, Dretske’s Explaining Behaviour, Jung’s …, Lyon’s The Disappearance of Introspection, Marr’s Vision, Paivio’s Mental Representations, Pylyshyn’s Computation and Cognition. All cut deep in trying to explain mind.
Transcendence of the Ego by Jean-Paul Sartre. Most of my undergrad courses were essay courses, and I could not write an essay without adding some kind of original spin, until I read this book. It took me two weeks just to decipher and summarize this book. I thought I met my match until I later read Being and Time by Martin Heidegger. I read 200 pages, pen in hand, finally taking a rest, never going back, though I read other more accessible treatments of it. This book defined slow reading to me. I consider it meta-philosophy. You don’t agree or disagree with it. It just is. Very Buddhist.
13 books





Leave your response!