Creative Reading: Thinking with Other Minds
- I, Reader: A Nod to Asimov’s I, Robot
- Robots and Readers: A Tight Coupling of Container and Content
- Does Technology only Extend Thought? Does It also Supplant It?
- Machine Life: The Final Prejudice
- RB-34 Prefers Slushy Novels
- Creative Reading: A Golden String
- Creative Reading by anemone achtnich
- Creative Reading: The Art of Self
- Creative Reading: Thinking with Other Minds
- Creative Reading: The Art of Self, Take 2
- Creative Reading: The Discovery of Other (Thinking with the Minds of Others, Take 2)
- Creative Reading: The Mathematics of Self, Other and Extension
- What Books Changed You?
- I’ve always admired people who, in a pinch, are better than their principles
- Every Extension Breaks a Rule
- The Trajectory of Reading: Creative Contribution
- I Read, Therefore I Write
- What Readers Write May Not Be Literature, But It Might Become So
- “Narrow it down to … the upper left-hand brick”: Phaedrus
- “No one that he knew had ever written a whole metaphysics before”: Phaedrus
- Using a Blog to Draft a Book Idea: 9 Observations
- From Reading to Writing to Publishing with Digital Media
- Birth of the Reader-Writer
- To Read a Book is to Ignore 4000 Others
- Quantity has a Quality all its Own
- The Web is Re-Wiring My Brain
- How the Web Works for Readers: Thin Connections Lead to Rich Connections
- The Accidental Programmer
- Definitions of Hacking
- Ways of the Reader-Hacker
- Ways of the Reader-Hacker II: Breaking the Rules
- Ways of the Reader Hacker III: Two Bright Ideas
- A Hacker’s Reading List
- Ones and Zeros, On and Off Switches, All Sane Systems Require Downtime
- The Information Race and Pushing the Button
- How to Make an Elephant Statue
- Every Story Deserves a Good Ending
- Expressions of Offworld
- “Would I start to resemble a book myself?”
- Myth of the Reader-Hero
- Print is Digital
- Am I Still Chasing that First Reading High?
- Do Robots Read? Yes I Do (Conclusion to “I, Reader”)
- I, Reader: A Book Outline
- Reading List for Next Draft of I, Reader
Reading as a Creative Act, Pt. 3
Why do we read? In the previous post I talked about the development of interiority as a product of creative reading. What follows here is about the discovery of others as a motive for creative reading.
We are creatures of appetite. It distinguishes us from the robots. We have many appetites, for food and sex, for friends and fulfillment. We are born hungry. It is first expressed as a physical hunger, but even before we can name it, it is also a psychological or spiritual hunger. Quickly we learn we cannot have all we want. Mother can’t provide it all the time, and others want it too. We delay gratification. We sublimate our urges. Substitution of one thing for another is the very root of thought and civilization. Reading substitutes text for reality. Reading is a substitute for gratification.
We are little things in a big world. We cannot walk all good paths. I select reading material from all over the map. Fiction and non-fiction; literary and genre; tweets, blogs, newspapers, and books; Dan Brown and Dickens; Harry Potter and Heidegger. Do I lack critical discernment? I don’t think so. My experience is limited, and I cannot experience everything, but I can take the shortcut of reading the experience of others. Reading is an accelerant of experience.
Life is too complex for one brain. When I am confused, it helps if someone has written about that experience. Reading shows us that we are not alone, even in our innermost thoughts. (Cue Elton John’s Sad Songs.) It is good to have companions on the road, if only in text.
In each of three answers, the discovery of others is a vital element. Reading has been called thinking with other minds, and it encourages me to think I can get some answers to the big, philosophical questions. Textbook philosophy is only a fraction of it. I mean philosophy in the personal, existential, spiritual, visceral sense. Life. Why? Why now? Who me? How come? What for? Life is often unyielding with answers to questions about meaning and purpose. It gives plenty of teasers but few satisfactory answers. Scientific inquiry may be a superior approach, but its answers may take more than my lifetime. Religious authority is insufficient without an inner experience to echo it. Reading is a conspiracy of minds toward satisfactory answers to the big questions within a single lifetime.
One of our oldest stories, that of Gilgamesh, tells of the discovery of “other”. Gilgamesh is a tyrant king who discovers a wild man, Enkidu, outside the city walls. Gilgamesh brings him into the city, and they become brothers, together more powerful and wonderful than before.

“Reading is a substitute for gratification.” Reading is both a substitute for gratification and gratification in and of itself. Just because I am reading about an experience that I have not experienced and, in that way, I have substituted someone else’s life for my own does not mean that the words I have read have not changed me, for better or worse…whether I have had the experience or not.
I am fairly sure we don’t disagree. Everything you have said is true. At the same time, I find reading to be a form of meditation. The content is not the important thing; the act of reading itself is what brings peace to my soul.
You’re right, Barbara. We don’t disagree. This post is about the more visceral dimension of reading.
Leave your response!
Slow Reading
Available from Litwin Books | Read a chapter online
OpenBook WordPress Plugin
Inserts a book cover image, title, author, and other book data from Open Library into a WordPress post.
Download the Plugin | Read More | Report an Issue | Join the Discussion List
Series
Other posts belonging to this series
What I’m Reading
Also Reading