RB-34 Prefers Slushy Novels
- I, Reader: A Nod to Asimov’s I, Robot
- Robots and Readers: A Tight Coupling of Container and Content
- Does Technology only Extend Thought? Does It also Supplant It?
- Machine Life: The Final Prejudice
- RB-34 Prefers Slushy Novels
- Creative Reading: A Golden String
- Creative Reading by anemone achtnich
- Creative Reading: The Art of Self
- Creative Reading: Thinking with Other Minds
- Creative Reading: The Art of Self, Take 2
- Creative Reading: The Discovery of Other (Thinking with the Minds of Others, Take 2)
- Creative Reading: The Mathematics of Self, Other and Extension
- What Books Changed You?
- I’ve always admired people who, in a pinch, are better than their principles
- Every Extension Breaks a Rule
- The Trajectory of Reading: Creative Contribution
- I Read, Therefore I Write
- What Readers Write May Not Be Literature, But It Might Become So
- “Narrow it down to … the upper left-hand brick”: Phaedrus
- “No one that he knew had ever written a whole metaphysics before”: Phaedrus
- Using a Blog to Draft a Book Idea: 9 Observations
- From Reading to Writing to Publishing with Digital Media
- Birth of the Reader-Writer
- To Read a Book is to Ignore 4000 Others
- Quantity has a Quality all its Own
- The Web is Re-Wiring My Brain
- How the Web Works for Readers: Thin Connections Lead to Rich Connections
- The Accidental Programmer
- Definitions of Hacking
- Ways of the Reader-Hacker
- Ways of the Reader-Hacker II: Breaking the Rules
- Ways of the Reader Hacker III: Two Bright Ideas
- A Hacker’s Reading List
- Ones and Zeros, On and Off Switches, All Sane Systems Require Downtime
- The Information Race and Pushing the Button
- How to Make an Elephant Statue
- Every Story Deserves a Good Ending
- Expressions of Offworld
- “Would I start to resemble a book myself?”
- Myth of the Reader-Hero
- Print is Digital
- Am I Still Chasing that First Reading High?
- Do Robots Read? Yes I Do (Conclusion to “I, Reader”)
- I, Reader: A Book Outline
- Reading List for Next Draft of I, Reader
Robots and Readers, Pt. 4
Do robots have a soul? Perhaps that seems a silly question. Robots do not eat. They do not sleep. They have no family. In Asimov’s I, Robot, they may not own property. After all, property cannot own property. Objects cannot own objects. Objects may be intelligent, but the intelligence is artificial. Robots do not have a soul. But how can one tell for sure? An inquiry into reading may provide some insight.
In I, Robot, machines have brushes with the divine. The Laws of Robotics forbid machines to harm or disobey humans, but in some cases humans give orders that may cause harm to themselves. One robot resolves the contradiction by inventing a deity with higher authority than humans. Another highly sophisticated robot, The Brain, is tasked with breaking the laws of physics, and can do so only through supernatural activity. When asked how it was possible, The Brain replies, “The matter admits to no explanation.” The three laws are essentially an ethical code, not so different from our own, naturally extending into metaphysical territory.
As humans, we think that since we create technology, we must be superior to it. Consider though that we only build things for tasks we do not do well. We create cars because they are faster than us. If we create thinking machines, it must be because they can think better than us. In one of Asimov’s tales, robot RB-34, aka Herbie, “does triple integrals in his head and eats up tensor analysis for dessert.” Even so, “the dope doesn’t like math. He would rather read slushy novels.” Herbie calls them “studies of the interplay of human motives and emotions.” If robots have a core code that governs their relationships with humans, it is no wonder that an intelligent robot would read to learn more about them.
Robots do not eat. Perhaps that is proof that they do not have a soul. On the other hand, religious ascetics aspire to transcend their physical needs, counting it as evidence of their spiritual progress. Personally, I think an appetite for knowledge and meaning is a good indicator of a spiritual dimension. This hunger may cause another corporeal attachment, an addiction to reading, since it allows them to think with other minds on their path of discovery. If you want to know if robots have a soul, look to their reading habits; I could say the same of people.
Related reading


![View this title in Open Library. Notes: Includes bibliographical references (p. [344]-368) and index. Age Of Spiritual Machines](http://covers.openlibrary.org/b/olid/OL376849M-S.jpg)
I am reading your processes with fascination AND trying to figure out how I can sneak in a quick (slow) re-read of “I, Robot.”
Thanks Barbara. I, Robot is one of those books worth a re-read. Chuckling and appreciating your idea of a quick-slow re-read.
Leave your response!
Slow Reading
Available from Litwin Books | Read a chapter online
OpenBook WordPress Plugin
Inserts a book cover image, title, author, and other book data from Open Library into a WordPress post.
Download the Plugin | Read More | Report an Issue | Join the Discussion List
Series
Other posts belonging to this series
What I’m Reading
Also Reading