Home » Slow Reading

“Paper vs. paperless: Which makes reading greener?”

3 June 2008 No Comment

Are e-books like the Kindle (left) and Sony Reader (right) more eco-friendly than paper books? The short answer is that we don’t know — yet.

Paper vs. paperless: Which makes reading greener? Via LISNews

Both paper and paperless information will be part of the future, but I find the e-book side of the debate uninformed and poorly thought out. This article asks a very important question that challenges the unexamined idea that e-books are greener. We need to examine the full life-cycle of a technology to evaluate that. As the article states, the numbers aren’t in yet. Mark Lindner was the reluctant host of a discussion on this subject a little ways back. One useful thing that came out of that discussion was this link from Paul R. Pival (The Distant Librarian) on the environmental pros and cons of reading newspapers online.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Print This Post Print This Post